Thursday, May 31, 2012

Drive across America, armed

Americans choose to take to the roads for vacations and to visit friends and family on Memorial Day. Often, they’ll bring their firearms with them for sport or personal protection, and it’s perfectly legal under federal law. This gets under the skin of a handful of anti-gun jurisdictions that have grown so out of control that they’ll jail an active-duty Afghanistan veteran who’s following the letter of the law. A growing, bipartisan movement in Congress is looking to stop the harassment.
Rep. H. Morgan Griffith, Virginia Republican, has sponsored legislation that would amend current law to make it clear that individuals who transport their guns from state to state may stop for food, gas and vehicle maintenance. They also may seek medical treatment, tend to an emergency, stay overnight and conduct other activities incidental to the transport.
These things are legal already, but because the law does not spell it out in explicit detail, gun-grabbing areas take advantage of the ambiguity. Mr. Griffith’s language would force states and localities to pay the attorney bills for anyone who is arrested for illegal transport if they are exonerated based on this proposed law.
“The beauty of this is that the fear of having to pay the legal fees will make sure they bring charges that are valid and founded,” said Mr. Griffith, a former defense attorney, in an interview with The Washington Times. “It only has to happen one time, and every risk-assessment manager in the United States of America is going to inform their police that you better make sure he’s violated the law before you arrest him for having a locked gun in a case in the trunk, because that’s going to cost them a lot of money.”


MILLER: Drive across America, armed - Washington Times

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Rand Paul Drops Bomb To Disarm Feds

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) is taking on the federal government once again, specifically the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On Wednesday Sen. Paul introduced an amendment to a FDA funding bill that would disarm the FDA and would achieve several other goals.

While I don't generally agree with everything the younger Paul says, he's spot-on here with the state overstepping its authority by intervening in exchanges between consenting adults. How can there be a crime without a victim?

Paul began his statement to the Senate,

"I'm troubled by images of armed agents raiding Amish farms and preventing them selling milk directly from the cow. I think we have bigger problems in our country than sending armed FDA agents into peaceful farmers' land and telling them they can't sell milk directly from the cow."

It seems his primary concern is over the federal government regulating the food industry from start to finish. One of the issues concerns unpasteurized milk, which is more healthy for you than, the stuff you get in the store, and it tastes better too. The federal government forbids it in interstate commerce. They think raw milk is a weapon of some sorts and farmers are the new terrorists.

Paul said that the first provision of the amendment would stop, "overzealous regulation of vitamins, food and supplements by codifying the First Amendment prohibition on prior restraint."

"The First Amendment says you can't prevent speech, even commercial speech, in advance of the speech. You can't tell Cheerios that they can't say there's a health benefit to their Cheerios. Under our current FDA laws, FDA says if you want to market prune juice, you can't say that it cures constipation," he said.

[...]


Thursday, May 24, 2012

The Double Barrel 1911

This is insane!

The Double Barrel Pistol by Arsenal Firearms, Italy

Apr 19 2012
This is the type of pistol we could see a James Bond villain using (a hint to filmmakers of the new Bond movie "Skyfall"). The AF2011-A1 "Second Century" incorporates the legendary John Browning M1911 design in both look and function.
The Italian manufacturer, Arsenal Firearms, states that the pistol will remain both ergonomic and easy to fire for anyone who can handle a regular 1911 pistol.
A little bit of background info on the company: formed by a firearm designer Nicola Bandini and gun miniature master Dimitry Streshinskiy (Russia). Arsenal owns a popular shotgun company Zanotti 1625, which has a pretty remarkable history of creating fine-crafted shotguns for well over 400 years.
crazy pistol
Although this isn't the first attempt at a double barrel pistol design, Arsenal claims that they will be the first to produce the pistols for the public - in the 1990's a Swiss armorer Vivian Mueller produced a double-barreled 9mm Sig P220 firearm using two stock weapons, custom fabrication, milling and a ton of custom made parts.
next bond villain pistol
Arsenal claims that instead of tooling existing 1911 pistols they have reverse engineered the 1911 pistol using 3-D software to create new and improved parts.
amazing 1911
Manufacturer also offers many customizable options when ordering the pistol; for example, the buyer has a choice to go with a single or double trigger system. The only discouraging part about the whole deal is the weight. It weights in at 4.07 pounds (1.85kg !!!) which is about the weight of a light assault rifle.
2011 pistol
Maintenance of this pistol can be performed by a regular gun smith that has knowledge of how to service a standard 1911 pistol.
machining pistol
The pistol is said to come in two different caliber options, the standard .45 APC and the .38 Super Auto. See full pistol specifications.

A photo provided by Arsenal, showing that the pistol is machined as a solid piece.

Pistol in Action:






The Double Barrel Pistol by Arsenal Firearms, Italy | I Like To Waste My Time

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Guns and the State




Here is my point of contention;

It is not the gun that is the core of statism, but the weakness of individual resolve that allows faith to be put into the "state," which in turn goes power to the "state."

For my next trick, I'll twist your noodle, I would even offer that there is no state. It is myth, words, inanimate buildings, and documents. The state can do no harm to the individual, no more than a tree can. The state holds no power over men, nor grants them rights. Individual liberty comes from life itself. Submission to and worship of the state encourages those of ill repute to use it as the method of control and conquest over fellow men. 

What I take issue with is those who seek to infringe upon the liberties of others "in the name of the state" for gain. They make individual decisions to dismiss the principles of nonaggression and property rights, from which most all else is derived. Doing so in the name of the state is simply an excuse to commit aggression toward others without fear of consequence. Hold the individual responsible instead of the institution and those acts may well be relegated to history. 

When firearms are outlawed, crime rates rise naturally, though similar assaults remain. Think of it in economic terms if you will. Aggression simply takes on another method, but is not abated. (google John Lott or Masaad Ayoob) If a factor which reduces violent crime is removed (private firearms ownership), the criminal actors will patronize that market willingly. Think of the UK after its miserable handgun ban, with violent crime rates skyrocketing 40% in only the first few years.  

It is not the gun which is the danger, but the person who wields it. It can no more harm you than the tree. As devout Second Amendment supporters will no doubt conclude, guns are not the problem, but the criminal which uses that tool for ill intent.

The initiation of force comes from the individual, not the state. The state simply encourages that aggression. 

Friday, May 18, 2012

My Hit and Miss Relationship with the 1911

Given the resources, I would easily carry a 1911 platform, but probably only the Colt New Agent in 9mm. I prefer the Sig double-stack platform with a pair in 9mm. For a 1911 platform, the Colt is a shoe-in for me. It's single-stack grip is slim but full. It's short barrel and bobbed tail keep printing to a minimum. Smooth edged help with concealed carry quite well, along with a serrated bobbed hammer. Crimson Trace laser grips and a lack of traditional sights, replaced by trench-style sights in the top surface of the slide, give adequate close contact sight picture, but the red dot on your target will help reassure you at any realistic distances and negate shot misplacement. Perfect. And beautiful.



The Colt New Agent: All Business For Concealed Carry

I'd pair it with a STI Trojan (why just piss money away?) with a 6" barrel for the range. Blued with synthetic grips. I only care for wood on true vintage firearms, ones with history and soul. Even something only as old as I am reminds me why I love the intersection of design and defense. That and STI is just down the road, about twice as far down the road as LaRue Tactical. God I love Texas.



Got a 9mm Trojan this weekend - Glock Talk

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Iowa Governor Branstad Rejects Lead Shot Ban for Dove Hunting

Iowa Governor Terry Branstad has rescinded a rule against use of lead ammunition in dove hunts.

The Iowa Natural Resources Commission, a citizens' panel appointed by the governor, passed that rule last year, over claims that lead shot for dove hunting was, somehow, a threat to human health.

No faulty logic there...

"That upset some hunters and some gun advocates. In response, the Legislature's Administrative Rules Review Committee agreed in August – about a month before the new dove season – to postpone enactment of the rule," the Des Moines Register reported.  "The Iowa House this year passed a resolution to nullify the rule and allow lead shot, but the measure died in the Senate, where it was not called for a vote. Had the governor not stepped in, the ban could have become effective this fall."

Of note, though, Branstad didn't rescind the no-lead rule over the human health issue.

The only real health issue for humans from lead shot is if a person is the one being shot...

"The determination of whether hunters should be forced to stop using traditional shot is something that should be decided by the Legislature, not by administrative fiat," Branstad said, before signing an executive order lifting the ban.

And wrong, sadly. The population as a whole must come together in near unanimity on any issue that requires state mandate, which must pass constitutional muster. Everything else is simply invalid fiat through force. 

"We support the governor's decision to do what we view is the right thing to protect the rights of Iowans," said Jeff Burkett, president of the Iowa Firearms Coalition.

http://www.gundigest.com/shotgun-reviews-articles/iowa-governor-branstad-rejects-lead-shot-ban-for-dove-hunting

Monday, May 14, 2012

Stand Your Ground: Florida voters support law

Florida voters — especially men and Republicans — support the state's Stand Your Ground law, an opinion poll has found.

A Suffolk University/WSVN-Ch. 7 poll released Thursday shows 50 percent of Florida voters support the law that allows people who feel threatened in the street or most other public places to use deadly force to defend themselves. Just 32 percent oppose the law and 18 percent are undecided.

Stand Your Ground has received intense scrutiny since the February shooting death of Trayvon Martin, a Miami Gardens 17 year old, in the central Florida city of Sanford.

Can common sense and fact prevail over emotion and opinion in Florida? It sounds like it. 

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Ron Paul fights to end military aid for Israel

Ron Paul fights to end military aid for Israel

Presidential hopeful Ron Paul has condemned a plan being considered in the United States House of Representatives that would allow for the US to continue aiding in the defense of Israel by equipping the Jewish state's military with added weaponry.

Once again, the term defense is misused, as those armaments are used for offensive actions toward other nations BEFORE Israel has justification for the use of force. They have become the bully that America has long been. 

From Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) attacked the contents of an act currently up for discussion that, if passed, would reestablish America's major role in Israeli affairs. Rep Paul fears, however, that it would do more harm than good for all nations involved.

There is NO good reason for peace-loving Americans to support the warmongering by either US or Israli statists. 


Original Page: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t886257/

In 2011, NYPD Made More Stops Of Young Black Men Than The Total Number Of Young Black Men In New York

During New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's first year in office, the New York Police Department stopped and interrogated 97,296 people on the streets. By 2007, with the Bloomberg administration pushing the a stop-and-frisk strategy, police made more than a half a million stops. Last year, the figure rose to a record 685,724 people. And according to a New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) report, the vast majorities of stops — about 87 percent — were of blacks and Latinos. Despite robust defenses of the tactics, they appear to be less effective than the Bloomberg administration and NYPD claim.

Most troubling, the NYCLU report seemed to bear out charges of racial profiling in stop-and-frisk situations. In precincts where blacks and Latinos are least represented among the population (14 percent or less), blacks and Latinos were nonetheless the target of 70 percent of stops. Perhaps most staggeringly, the the Wall Street Journal highlighted that the number of stops of black men between the ages of 14 and 24 (168,126 ) exceeded the total city population of black men in that age range (158,406).

So, enabling the police to infringe upon the natural and constitutional rights of citizens has only led to marginal increases in illegal weapons discoveries, though racial profiling rises to the surface as a disproportionate number of minorities are targeted by the unwarranted searches. 

Along with the wildly disproportionate stops, blacks and Latinos were more likely to get frisked. Yet they yielded a smaller percentage of weapons than whites. The NYCLU produced these charts demonstrating the disparities:

On Bloomberg's weekly radio show last month, Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly defended the stop-and-frisk strategy, whose increased application they credit with a 50 percent drop in the city's murder rate, but it's not at all clear how this strategy produced such an outcome. Comparing 2003 and 2011, stops increased by more than half a million while only 172 more guns were found. That's a jump of finding one gun for every 266 stops versus one gun per every 3,000 stops.

It's long since time for the residents of NYC to come together against the billionaire mayor (seriously, who really thought that was a good idea?) and the violent police force, and their efforts to undermine our collective civil liberties. 

Yeah, I used the "L" word. 

Original Page: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/05/10/481589/nypd-stop-and-frisk-young-black-men/

Democrats Withdraw Trayvon Martin Amendment




This week House Democrats pushed for a 'Trayvon Amendment' that would dock federal criminal justice grants to states that have stand-your-ground laws, essentially punishing states that protect a citizen's fundamental right of self defense. ...

Instead of taking a position of law or at least logic, anti-gun/anti-rights statists choose to use monetary policy to undermine the rule of law. Figures. Hoplophobes...


Original Page: http://www.guns.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7760

Thursday, May 3, 2012

ATF Answers the Top 10 Most Frequently Asked Questions




ATF answers the top 10 most frequently asked questions. Topics include, the transfer of firearms between states, felons restoring rights to own firearms, firearm registration with the ATF, making firearms for personal use. ...

The best part of the article are the five questions for the ATF. 

In total, how many guns has the ATF let "walk" across the border into Mexico as a result of sting operations like Fast and Furious and Wide Receiver?

holder-1When did the ATF inform Attorney General Eric Holder about Operation Fast and Furious?

Why hasn't anyone been held accountable for Fast and Furious (there's been reassignments, but no one's lost his/her job)?

Emails prove that ATF agents used the consequences of Fast and Furious as a means to pass tighter restrictions on FFLs (Demand Letter 3), is this not corruption of the highest order?  

What does the ATF say to the family of slain Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry
 


Original Page: http://www.guns.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7547

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Violent Class Warfare

The victim's friend, a young woman, tried to pull him back into his car. Attackers came after her, pulling her hair, punching her head and causing a bloody scratch to the surface of her eye. She called 911. A recording told her all lines were busy. She called again. Busy. On her third try, she got through and, hysterical, could scream only their location.

When seconds count, police are minutes away (and generally useless at that). 

Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton.

It happened four blocks from where they work, here at The Virginian-Pilot.

Two weeks have passed since reporters Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami - friends to me and many others at the newspaper - were attacked on a Saturday night as they drove home from a show at the Attucks Theatre. They had stopped at a red light, in a crowd of at least 100 young people walking on the sidewalk. Rostami locked her car door. Someone threw a rock at her window. Forster got out to confront the rock-thrower, and that's when the beating began.

Neither suffered grave injuries, but both were out of work for a week. Forster's torso ached from blows to his ribs, and he retained a thumb-sized bump on his head. Rostami fears to be alone in her home. Forster wishes he'd stayed in the car.

Many stories that begin this way end much worse. Another colleague recently wrote about the final defendant to be sentenced in the beating death of 19-year-old James Robertson in East Ocean View five years ago. In that case, a swarm of gang members attacked Robertson and two friends. Robertson's friends got away and called for help; police arrived to find Robertson's stripped, swollen corpse.

Forster and Rostami's story has not, until today, appeared in this paper. The responding officer coded the incident as a simple assault, despite their assertions that at least 30 people had participated in the attack. A reporter making routine checks of police reports would see "simple assault" and, if the names were unfamiliar, would be unlikely to write about it. In this case, editors hesitated to assign a story about their own employees. Would it seem like the paper treated its employees differently from other crime victims?

More questions loomed.

Forster and Rostami wondered if the officer who answered their call treated all crime victims the same way. When Rostami, who admits she was hysterical, tried to describe what had happened, she says the officer told her to shut up and get in the car. Both said the officer did not record any names of witnesses who stopped to help. Rostami said the officer told them the attackers were "probably juveniles anyway. What are we going to do? Find their parents and tell them?"

The officer pointed to public housing in the area and said large groups of teenagers look for trouble on the weekends. "It's what they do," he told Forster.

"Not my problem" seems to be the response from law enforcement. I wonder if he was simply trying to instill more dissent toward law enforcement, having less and less justification for its own existence as time goes on and the public wakes up to realize they are responsible for their own security. 

Could that be true? Could violent mobs of teens be so commonplace in Norfolk that police and victims have no recourse?

Police spokesman Chris Amos said officers often respond to reports of crowds fighting; sirens are usually enough to disperse the group. On that night, he said, a report of gunfire in a nearby neighborhood prompted the officer to decide getting Forster and Rostami off the street quickly made more sense than remaining at the intersection. The officer gave them his card and told them to call later to file a report.

The next day, Forster searched Twitter for mention of the attack.

One post chilled him.

"I feel for the white man who got beat up at the light," wrote one person.

"I don't," wrote another, indicating laughter. "(do it for trayvon martin)"

Obama's class warfare is having unintended (or maybe intended) consequences. The Romans had a term; divide et impera, or divide and rule. Seems to be working well for both sides of the single party system running this nation... 

Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teen, died after being shot by a community watch captain with white and Hispanic parents, George Zimmerman, in Florida.

Forster and Rostami, both white, suffered a beating at the hands of a crowd of black teenagers.

Was either case racially motivated? Were Forster and Rostami beaten in some kind of warped, vigilante retribution for a killing 750 miles away, a person none of them knew? Was it just bombast? Is a beating funny, ever?

A concealed carry permit should be a given to defend one's life in a situation like this. 

Here's why their story is in the paper today. We cannot allow such callousness to continue unremarked, from the irrational, senseless teenagers who attacked two people just trying to go home, from the police officer whose conduct may have been typical but certainly seems cold, from the tweeting nitwits who think beating a man in Norfolk will change the death of Trayvon Martin.

How can we change it if we don't know about it? How can we make it better if we look away?

Are we really no better than this?

http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleton

Do It for Trayvon

Man, getting out of the mobile armor sure was stupid. [Read]

And the "Only Ones" sure proved worse than useless.

Too bad Cunning Linguist Walt wasn't there--he could have used his tongue.

Man, it's a good thing that Walt is ending his column. He really doesn't know what he's talking about. 

Original Page: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheWarOnGuns/~3/IYwgQpIzjsQ/do-it-for-trayvon.html

1992 L.A. Riots Or How Californians Learned, Then Forgot, To Embrace The Gun

If asked to identify two recent SHTF events on our soil, many of us might probably respond with Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the 1992 L.A. riots.

The Second Amendment is nearly non-existent in Kalifornia, to the point that we see the obvious negatives results which only occur municipalities where the elite disarm the population in order to control them. 


Original Page: http://www.topix.net/guns/2012/05/1992-l-a-riots-or-how-californians-learned-then-forgot-to-embrace-the-gun?fromrss=1