Thursday, May 10, 2012

Ron Paul fights to end military aid for Israel

Ron Paul fights to end military aid for Israel

Presidential hopeful Ron Paul has condemned a plan being considered in the United States House of Representatives that would allow for the US to continue aiding in the defense of Israel by equipping the Jewish state's military with added weaponry.

Once again, the term defense is misused, as those armaments are used for offensive actions toward other nations BEFORE Israel has justification for the use of force. They have become the bully that America has long been. 

From Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) attacked the contents of an act currently up for discussion that, if passed, would reestablish America's major role in Israeli affairs. Rep Paul fears, however, that it would do more harm than good for all nations involved.

There is NO good reason for peace-loving Americans to support the warmongering by either US or Israli statists. 


Original Page: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t886257/

In 2011, NYPD Made More Stops Of Young Black Men Than The Total Number Of Young Black Men In New York

During New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's first year in office, the New York Police Department stopped and interrogated 97,296 people on the streets. By 2007, with the Bloomberg administration pushing the a stop-and-frisk strategy, police made more than a half a million stops. Last year, the figure rose to a record 685,724 people. And according to a New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) report, the vast majorities of stops — about 87 percent — were of blacks and Latinos. Despite robust defenses of the tactics, they appear to be less effective than the Bloomberg administration and NYPD claim.

Most troubling, the NYCLU report seemed to bear out charges of racial profiling in stop-and-frisk situations. In precincts where blacks and Latinos are least represented among the population (14 percent or less), blacks and Latinos were nonetheless the target of 70 percent of stops. Perhaps most staggeringly, the the Wall Street Journal highlighted that the number of stops of black men between the ages of 14 and 24 (168,126 ) exceeded the total city population of black men in that age range (158,406).

So, enabling the police to infringe upon the natural and constitutional rights of citizens has only led to marginal increases in illegal weapons discoveries, though racial profiling rises to the surface as a disproportionate number of minorities are targeted by the unwarranted searches. 

Along with the wildly disproportionate stops, blacks and Latinos were more likely to get frisked. Yet they yielded a smaller percentage of weapons than whites. The NYCLU produced these charts demonstrating the disparities:

On Bloomberg's weekly radio show last month, Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly defended the stop-and-frisk strategy, whose increased application they credit with a 50 percent drop in the city's murder rate, but it's not at all clear how this strategy produced such an outcome. Comparing 2003 and 2011, stops increased by more than half a million while only 172 more guns were found. That's a jump of finding one gun for every 266 stops versus one gun per every 3,000 stops.

It's long since time for the residents of NYC to come together against the billionaire mayor (seriously, who really thought that was a good idea?) and the violent police force, and their efforts to undermine our collective civil liberties. 

Yeah, I used the "L" word. 

Original Page: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/05/10/481589/nypd-stop-and-frisk-young-black-men/

Democrats Withdraw Trayvon Martin Amendment




This week House Democrats pushed for a 'Trayvon Amendment' that would dock federal criminal justice grants to states that have stand-your-ground laws, essentially punishing states that protect a citizen's fundamental right of self defense. ...

Instead of taking a position of law or at least logic, anti-gun/anti-rights statists choose to use monetary policy to undermine the rule of law. Figures. Hoplophobes...


Original Page: http://www.guns.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7760

Thursday, May 3, 2012

ATF Answers the Top 10 Most Frequently Asked Questions




ATF answers the top 10 most frequently asked questions. Topics include, the transfer of firearms between states, felons restoring rights to own firearms, firearm registration with the ATF, making firearms for personal use. ...

The best part of the article are the five questions for the ATF. 

In total, how many guns has the ATF let "walk" across the border into Mexico as a result of sting operations like Fast and Furious and Wide Receiver?

holder-1When did the ATF inform Attorney General Eric Holder about Operation Fast and Furious?

Why hasn't anyone been held accountable for Fast and Furious (there's been reassignments, but no one's lost his/her job)?

Emails prove that ATF agents used the consequences of Fast and Furious as a means to pass tighter restrictions on FFLs (Demand Letter 3), is this not corruption of the highest order?  

What does the ATF say to the family of slain Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry
 


Original Page: http://www.guns.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7547

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Violent Class Warfare

The victim's friend, a young woman, tried to pull him back into his car. Attackers came after her, pulling her hair, punching her head and causing a bloody scratch to the surface of her eye. She called 911. A recording told her all lines were busy. She called again. Busy. On her third try, she got through and, hysterical, could scream only their location.

When seconds count, police are minutes away (and generally useless at that). 

Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton.

It happened four blocks from where they work, here at The Virginian-Pilot.

Two weeks have passed since reporters Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami - friends to me and many others at the newspaper - were attacked on a Saturday night as they drove home from a show at the Attucks Theatre. They had stopped at a red light, in a crowd of at least 100 young people walking on the sidewalk. Rostami locked her car door. Someone threw a rock at her window. Forster got out to confront the rock-thrower, and that's when the beating began.

Neither suffered grave injuries, but both were out of work for a week. Forster's torso ached from blows to his ribs, and he retained a thumb-sized bump on his head. Rostami fears to be alone in her home. Forster wishes he'd stayed in the car.

Many stories that begin this way end much worse. Another colleague recently wrote about the final defendant to be sentenced in the beating death of 19-year-old James Robertson in East Ocean View five years ago. In that case, a swarm of gang members attacked Robertson and two friends. Robertson's friends got away and called for help; police arrived to find Robertson's stripped, swollen corpse.

Forster and Rostami's story has not, until today, appeared in this paper. The responding officer coded the incident as a simple assault, despite their assertions that at least 30 people had participated in the attack. A reporter making routine checks of police reports would see "simple assault" and, if the names were unfamiliar, would be unlikely to write about it. In this case, editors hesitated to assign a story about their own employees. Would it seem like the paper treated its employees differently from other crime victims?

More questions loomed.

Forster and Rostami wondered if the officer who answered their call treated all crime victims the same way. When Rostami, who admits she was hysterical, tried to describe what had happened, she says the officer told her to shut up and get in the car. Both said the officer did not record any names of witnesses who stopped to help. Rostami said the officer told them the attackers were "probably juveniles anyway. What are we going to do? Find their parents and tell them?"

The officer pointed to public housing in the area and said large groups of teenagers look for trouble on the weekends. "It's what they do," he told Forster.

"Not my problem" seems to be the response from law enforcement. I wonder if he was simply trying to instill more dissent toward law enforcement, having less and less justification for its own existence as time goes on and the public wakes up to realize they are responsible for their own security. 

Could that be true? Could violent mobs of teens be so commonplace in Norfolk that police and victims have no recourse?

Police spokesman Chris Amos said officers often respond to reports of crowds fighting; sirens are usually enough to disperse the group. On that night, he said, a report of gunfire in a nearby neighborhood prompted the officer to decide getting Forster and Rostami off the street quickly made more sense than remaining at the intersection. The officer gave them his card and told them to call later to file a report.

The next day, Forster searched Twitter for mention of the attack.

One post chilled him.

"I feel for the white man who got beat up at the light," wrote one person.

"I don't," wrote another, indicating laughter. "(do it for trayvon martin)"

Obama's class warfare is having unintended (or maybe intended) consequences. The Romans had a term; divide et impera, or divide and rule. Seems to be working well for both sides of the single party system running this nation... 

Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teen, died after being shot by a community watch captain with white and Hispanic parents, George Zimmerman, in Florida.

Forster and Rostami, both white, suffered a beating at the hands of a crowd of black teenagers.

Was either case racially motivated? Were Forster and Rostami beaten in some kind of warped, vigilante retribution for a killing 750 miles away, a person none of them knew? Was it just bombast? Is a beating funny, ever?

A concealed carry permit should be a given to defend one's life in a situation like this. 

Here's why their story is in the paper today. We cannot allow such callousness to continue unremarked, from the irrational, senseless teenagers who attacked two people just trying to go home, from the police officer whose conduct may have been typical but certainly seems cold, from the tweeting nitwits who think beating a man in Norfolk will change the death of Trayvon Martin.

How can we change it if we don't know about it? How can we make it better if we look away?

Are we really no better than this?

http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleton

Do It for Trayvon

Man, getting out of the mobile armor sure was stupid. [Read]

And the "Only Ones" sure proved worse than useless.

Too bad Cunning Linguist Walt wasn't there--he could have used his tongue.

Man, it's a good thing that Walt is ending his column. He really doesn't know what he's talking about. 

Original Page: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheWarOnGuns/~3/IYwgQpIzjsQ/do-it-for-trayvon.html

1992 L.A. Riots Or How Californians Learned, Then Forgot, To Embrace The Gun

If asked to identify two recent SHTF events on our soil, many of us might probably respond with Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the 1992 L.A. riots.

The Second Amendment is nearly non-existent in Kalifornia, to the point that we see the obvious negatives results which only occur municipalities where the elite disarm the population in order to control them. 


Original Page: http://www.topix.net/guns/2012/05/1992-l-a-riots-or-how-californians-learned-then-forgot-to-embrace-the-gun?fromrss=1